Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Which athlete do you consider to be the best in the world?
P.S. Federer has a rating of 8370, and Nadal (who is second) has 4470. Feel the differenceFederer is undoubtedly good; he has practically no weak spots. But anyone who understands tennis will tell you that the rest of the current generation is surprisingly frail. Of course, with such opponents, it's possible to break all records. But whether Federer would have beaten a young Sampras or not is a huge question. It seems to me: yes on courts like Australia, parity at the US Open, and no on grass. And this is taking into account some margin that Roger undoubtedly has, because he simply has no one who forces him to play at 110%.
without a doubt. The best is Michael Schumacher. A legend of royal racing.
Yes, Misha is cool. But don't forget about Rory Byrne. Until he retired and Newey gave up on McLaren, only their cars were winning. And that went on for about 15 years.