Overall rating for all games.

Therefore, I think a situation where the placements do not match the rating is acceptable. But whether it is correct or not, I am no longer arguing.

That is why I would like to hear the author's opinion on the logic of such a shuffle as applied to this specific case.

You better tell me, do you have any complaints about my rating or not?

As such, I have no complaints about author ratings at all; that is why they are called author ratings. It only makes sense to criticize the official rating—for example, the one by which the winner of the Van Kanigem tournament will be announced (I simply do not know who was chosen)—and even then, it's not up to me. But if you are interested in my opinion on your rating, I find it quite appealing, as well as the very idea of dependence on the days ratio parameter. As a weak point, I would highlight the fact that this dependence is relatively weak. It seems to me that it should be strengthened—for example, by squaring it.