Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
P.S. Regarding your question, Fireball. I think it's very difficult to calculate and track this bonus coefficient in the AlexPanka system, especially for the average user. So, you noticed an error in the oscillator – that's good, but try checking if your bonus was calculated correctly. AlexPank, there's also a typo in your username – fix it! Yes, AlexPanka has the most complex rating calculation process, which is why I give him extra points for this work. And now, explaining why someone overtook someone else...
I can quite easily understand the arithmetic of the calculation, but the result is somewhat surprising. In my opinion, the winner should always have the highest rating, and if this is not the case, the rating should be adjusted. As I understand it, AlexeyPank took on the task of taking several parameters into account in his rating, and not just the ratio of days, but the formulas should always give a logical result, i.e., the positions in the rating should match the positions in the tournament.