First of all, the link to the images is broken.

Just enter "riots in London" in Yandex or Google and click on the images section.

Secondly, I asked you a question about Ukrainians and the Russian language, and you ignored it. Will you answer it after all?

And what if a Ukrainian speaks Russian, does that mean he is no longer Ukrainian?

And if he is from St. Petersburg, but supports Spartak, does that mean he is no longer from St. Petersburg?

Dividing people based on national identity is only necessary for political and ideological confrontation. In everyday and business communication, it is important what language a person speaks and what cultural patterns he has.

So, if a person speaks Russian and behaves like a Russian, then I perceive him as a Russian, even if he is black. And this approach is very common among Russians - it has developed over centuries of living in a multinational environment. For example, the problem with guest workers from the south is not in their nationality, but in their boisterous behavior and clustering in diasporas, and partly in their poor command of the language.

Added 7 minutes later

If we don't resist the totalitarian regime, we will soon live like in Africa.

If you knew history better, you would know that almost all state entities in Russia were totalitarian. And life was generally good when totalitarian leaders dominated their neighbors - ritually or physically.

But as soon as democracy began to emerge, the state immediately plunged into turmoil and the standard of living significantly decreased. This has happened many times, and it was only cured by the emergence of a new totalitarian leader.

Think about it yourself, why...

And, by the way, in democratic countries, life was also good only as long as democratic leaders dominated their neighbors, ritually or physically.