Well, here we have Romario, you, and Lawyer. And yet, we have different opinions. We argue about different things; you, Lawyer, are for freedom of rights and expression of will, and I am against it; I prefer a totalitarian regime. And I base my choice not on some media outlets, but on my experience managing 20-30 people. Yes, it's not a country, but my experience in this regard has shown that totalitarian management is more effective, but, of course, there are more dissatisfied people under it.
And in such revolutions, I always hand over the reins to these revolutionaries. The results were always the same: some go to the forest, some go for firewood, complete lawlessness. And you, as an experienced organizer, should understand this perfectly. As soon as you start bending over backward, there will immediately be an attempt to take advantage of you. The problem is that, as practice has shown, Yanukovych is a really bad organizer, almost everyone agrees with this, but there is nothing better at the moment... And now the argument is not about Yanukovych being bad, but about finding a worthy replacement for him. And there isn't one...
Go ahead. Having your own opinion is great. Just don't present it as the only correct one, and especially don't speak for all of Kyiv (Ukraine, Russia, America, the Death Star, or fascist Mars).
It's time to either state your point of view or stop interfering with the discussion.
Sorry for interrupting the respected gentlemen's discussion.
My position in short:
1. I am not participating in the events in the center of Kyiv. Not yet. I hope I won't have to.
2. I support an anti-system revolt.
3. I do not support "Euromaidan," "the opposition," or "peaceful protests."
ps. Yes, I am an evil and terrible Bandera supporter. boo :smile51:
pps. Reading again and again about "European Unions," "do you really think you will live like in Germany?", "the USA," etc. - it's just :facepalm:
