Auto-translated
And?
My comment showed that we often overlook certain nuances. That's how "subjective opinion" arises.
Objectively, the selection of 16 should be done like this:
- clearly define what is taken into account;
- evaluate each criterion, for example, in points;
- go through the heroic history of all candidates;
- sum up or come up with a more complex formula with coefficients for seniority, etc.
It's a week's worth of work. And it's pointless.
Personally, from the list of 9 people, I was "subjectively" confident in 5. The remaining candidates (and there were about 10 more) we discussed for a long time. We came to the list that we came to.
Here are 3 lists that those who decided to play organizers wrote here, and they also differ. If these three were the hosts, they would have to form one list. That is, they would also have to discuss and decide, someone would have to give in, and someone would have to add arguments for their candidates. It's not as simple as it seems at first glance.
Redwhait HP.
According to my information, you and Валенк were supposed to finish playing yesterday.
I don't see a report or an award. Given the, let's say, lenient deadlines in Diamond, you need to adjust to 11 days.
Someone is digging up dirt on you :)