Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Generally, you are adults and should understand that behind the scenes, negotiations are constantly taking place. During the day, it's a performance on stage, perhaps a premiere, but in the evening, they are just ordinary people.
Yes, we are probably adults and understand this perfectly. But in this case, psychology interferes with this stereotype. In my opinion, a member of the Guild of Thieves and a Rogue will never come to an agreement because they know each other's nature, just like a Rogue and another Rogue for the same reason. They can talk on the phone every day, but that doesn't mean they will actually agree on something. Each has their own plans and ambitions. They can quite easily use each other to achieve their goals, but it is unlikely that they will come to an agreement and create a grand scheme. For this, they need to form a team, and for this, there must be trust between them. But what kind of trust can there be in this pair? If one of them trusts the other, the game will be over.
And if they did come to an agreement, how could such a mastermind allow the Maidan to happen? Or is this also part of a grand plan? Then what awaits us next? A forceful solution? You yourself deny such a possibility. What other options are there?