Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I think everyone here is familiar with Tolkien's epic, "The Lord of the Rings."
Is the destruction of the One Ring a positive or negative event? Why was it done? Perhaps the reason was the foolish, youthful maximalism of Frodo Baggins?
Yes, Sauron fell, but was there a worthy candidate to replace him? Perhaps after this, an even worse villain will come to power. Under Sauron, there was stability, and all the inhabitants of Middle-earth had the opportunity to join him and live well at the expense of those who did not join. And what should they do now?
With their good intentions, foolish protesters plunged Middle-earth into the 1990s. By destroying the One Ring, they destroyed the barn that Sauron had been building for thousands of years.
Middle-earth will have to rebuild the barn and deal with the consequences of the revolution for a long time...