Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Read "The Master and Margarita." I wouldn't say that the principle of "everything is known in comparison" applies 100% in this case, but there is still a feeling that it's a "prototype" and something "created based on a model."
As for the film, the director simply depicted Bulgakov's work. Therefore, your words about how everyone sees what they want to see also apply to the film. Essentially, the film's "cardboard" quality is a reflection of the novel's "cardboard" quality, no more, no less, which may seem unfortunate. One of the most attractive features of the novel is the novelty and originality of the idea, but if it turns out that the idea is not original, then, apart from a few remarkable images and the same satire,
Настоящие герои - не те, пред кем мы преклоняемся, а те, кого мы оплевываем...[/COLOR] ----------------------------- "So much has gone and little is new"