Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
But what’s the point of these two shots if one of the main units, at its third level, has only 10 health points and dies in droves from the simplest spells and weak attacks?
The benefit is much greater than from single shots. The fact that damage is much more important than survivability for archers is a well-known fact.
Archers in Might and Magic III did not have two shots in the basic version.
And that’s why they looked bad in the basic version. It will be the same here.
5. Orcs: I just don’t understand why the War Monger and Shaman, who are weaker (compared to the Centaur in terms of design), are higher levels than the horse-man. I would like to see him at least at the third or fourth level.
I would say that the Orc (a mountain of muscles and a living killing machine, 2.2 meters tall) and the Centaur are comparable, and the Shamans are Sorceresses and belong to the elite troops, so they are stronger than ordinary ones.
As for the rest, there are no particular complaints about what I haven’t written.
Разработчик Heroes 5.5 WarGame Edition. Сайт проекта - пока неактивен Автор Асимметричных шахмат