КостяN
Auto-translated
I have a suggestion to limit the time for making predictions. For example, 3 rounds before the end of the tournament, so that truly good forecasters enter the ranking, and not those who paid more. In the last 3 rounds, at least, you have to guess correctly.
It is impossible to pay more than 600 rubles, so the argument about who paid more or less is not serious. Besides, please note that we don't have a charity tournament for forecasters, but an improvised bookmaker, albeit primitive and flawed for now - it's just a chance to win without investing a single ruble, even if it's hypothetical...
Second suggestion: if there is no winner in the BOB tournament, let the prize fund be divided either among the top three or half of the fund goes to the winner, and the other half remains with the bookmaker :) or any other way to distribute it.
If there are no winners, the prize fund goes to the next BOB, in full. Depending on the activity and enthusiasm of the participants, there may, of course, be variations.
Question: it says that you need to make 2-3 predictions per round, so if you always make 2, the chance of making a mistake is less compared to those who make 3. Why not a fixed number of predictions? And can you, for example, always make only one prediction? Or will the number of predictions decrease in accordance with the decrease in the number of player pairs? I suggest making a fixed number of predictions and reducing their number in stages. For example, start with 3, then 2, and in the last rounds, which don't have rematches, make only one, or if you leave the number of predictions up to the user, then at the end of the tournament, if there are several winners, distribute the prize fund not in half among all of them, but depending on the number of correct predictions.
For now, the adequate number of mandatory predictions per round seems to be THREE, and you can choose from several pairs (8-10 approximately) - in my opinion, for what is already an easy BOB, it's too easy to change anything. It wasn't about Kostyan, who is such a philanthropist, simply giving away 100 bucks; if you read the rules carefully, you have to earn them, win them.
Now a little about the transparency of bets:
since everyone has 24 hours to place bets, it is necessary that the bets be announced publicly and, of course, cannot be changed. Theoretically, by adding a little negativity, the organizer can participate in match-fixing himself :) so this unpleasant detail needs to be eliminated somehow. For example, announce it somewhere on the forum in a room with a password, and after the end of the round, give the password to everyone to check, of course, editing messages in the room should also be prohibited.
"Scandals. Intrigues. Investigations." And, characteristically, the investigation and suspicion occur even before the "crime" is committed:smile04:. If there are reasons not to trust the host, I recommend not signing up. In what bookmaker, I wonder, do they publish the number of people who bet on a particular outcome? The host will be monitored by the saved correspondence in PM - if necessary, it can be easily retrieved and checked.
And finally, to make a prediction, it is necessary to know what the opponents will be playing, WoG or SoD. This is the most important point for the forecasters' tournament. Many players play differently on different versions, and it is incorrect to make a bet without knowing the version of the game.
By default, it's SoD; if both players suddenly want to play WoG, they must notify each other in the thread as soon as possible after the draw (and then let everyone decide for themselves whether to wait or not for such notifications before placing a bet).
Ибу ибуди - хуйдао муди - Шаг за шагом можно достигнуть цели (китайская мудрость)
Кто к нам с пером придёт, тот от пера и погибнет!:smile51:
Кто к нам с пером придёт, тот от пера и погибнет!:smile51:
