Auto-translated
I will participate in the bracket.
584985121
I have a suggestion to limit the time for making predictions. For example, 3 rounds before the end of the tournament, so that only really good predictors enter the leaderboard, and not those who paid more.
The last 3 rounds should at least have mandatory correct predictions.
My second suggestion: if there is no winner in the bracket tournament, then the prize pool should be divided either among the top three or half of the pool goes to the winner, and the other half remains with the organizer. Or any other way to divide it.
Question: it says that you need to make 2-3 predictions per round, so if you always make 2, the chance of making a mistake is less compared to those who will make 3. Why not a fixed number of predictions? And can you, for example, always make only one prediction? Or will the number of predictions decrease in accordance with the decrease in the number of participating players? I suggest making a fixed number of predictions and reducing their number in stages. For example, start with 3, then 2, and in the last rounds, which do not involve rematches, make only one. Or, if you leave the number of predictions optional, then at the end of the tournament, if there are several winners, distribute the prize pool not equally among all, but depending on the number of correct predictions.
Now a little about the transparency of bets:
since everyone has 24 hours to place bets, it is necessary that the bets are announced publicly and cannot be changed. Theoretically, by adding a little negativity, the organizer can participate in match-fixing. Therefore, this unpleasant detail needs to be eliminated somehow. For example, announce it somewhere on the forum in a password-protected room, and after the end of the round, give the password to everyone so that they can check, of course, editing messages in the room should also not be allowed.
And lastly, in order to make a prediction, it is necessary to know what the opponents will be playing on, WoG or SoD. This is the most important point for the predictor tournament. Many players play differently on different versions, and it is incorrect to make a bet without knowing the version of the game.
P.S. Kostyan, could you extend the registration period a little and think through the tournament plan a bit more?
584985121
I have a suggestion to limit the time for making predictions. For example, 3 rounds before the end of the tournament, so that only really good predictors enter the leaderboard, and not those who paid more.
The last 3 rounds should at least have mandatory correct predictions.
My second suggestion: if there is no winner in the bracket tournament, then the prize pool should be divided either among the top three or half of the pool goes to the winner, and the other half remains with the organizer. Or any other way to divide it.
Question: it says that you need to make 2-3 predictions per round, so if you always make 2, the chance of making a mistake is less compared to those who will make 3. Why not a fixed number of predictions? And can you, for example, always make only one prediction? Or will the number of predictions decrease in accordance with the decrease in the number of participating players? I suggest making a fixed number of predictions and reducing their number in stages. For example, start with 3, then 2, and in the last rounds, which do not involve rematches, make only one. Or, if you leave the number of predictions optional, then at the end of the tournament, if there are several winners, distribute the prize pool not equally among all, but depending on the number of correct predictions.
Now a little about the transparency of bets:
since everyone has 24 hours to place bets, it is necessary that the bets are announced publicly and cannot be changed. Theoretically, by adding a little negativity, the organizer can participate in match-fixing. Therefore, this unpleasant detail needs to be eliminated somehow. For example, announce it somewhere on the forum in a password-protected room, and after the end of the round, give the password to everyone so that they can check, of course, editing messages in the room should also not be allowed.
And lastly, in order to make a prediction, it is necessary to know what the opponents will be playing on, WoG or SoD. This is the most important point for the predictor tournament. Many players play differently on different versions, and it is incorrect to make a bet without knowing the version of the game.
P.S. Kostyan, could you extend the registration period a little and think through the tournament plan a bit more?
МУДРЫЙ - не обязательно старый, ОПЫТНЫЙ - не обязательно мудрый... обладатель и того и другого всегда должен помнить слова НАПОЛЕОНА БОНАПАРТА: Война состоит из непредусмотренных событий; В каждом большом деле всегда приходится какую-то часть оставить на долю :smile33: СЛУЧАЯ...