I don't think Indra is a blatant cheater; I won’t rule out the possibility that this is his first time doing it.
Spring season 2009.
SEM_56 received the save file for replay several days after the game was postponed.
/topic/5780/
From 267 - Oelm's report, then 273 and up to 282.
The situation is exactly the same as now.
Almost 4 years have passed since then. You need to be quite an optimist to believe that there were only two such situations.
And Oelm never really hid the fact that he believes he has the right to "think" a little about the saved game of a postponed match:
/topic/at/526288/
Didn't understand the question, are you suggesting opening something in parallel?
In general, with postponed games, they always do this. Simply because, for example, in the later stages, you need to keep a huge amount of information in your head (I don’t mean pathetic balance-panic, of course), sometimes chains are calculated cell by cell, and there is a plan for the game three or four days ahead, at least among good players, and if there is also time pressure...
Pete's case seems to be some kind of major exception.
Whether it's single player or multiplayer doesn't matter much. After all, can't a hidden map hacker secretly peek at the map anyway?
P.S. Maybe there is a different ethic on blitz controls, but such matches are usually not postponed.
It seems that in the topic, they gently explained that he shouldn't do that, quoted the rules, and expressed the opinion of the forum.