Forum

On the Internet, you can find a number of articles and websites by opponents of vaccination, which are characterized by a number of differences from medical and scientific literature. These differences include:
Copying information without proper verification.
Posting unverified and obviously unreliable information, rumors.
Rabies is one of the most dangerous infectious diseases: in humans, infection with the rabies virus inevitably leads to a fatal outcome if symptoms develop, and only urgent vaccination after infection with the virus can prevent the development of the disease. Cases of recovery after the appearance of rabies symptoms are rare: as of 2007, only 6 such cases were known.
A tendency not to make corrections and not to publish refutations, even if the original article turned out to be clearly erroneous.
Sophistic, erroneous, and inconsistent arguments.
Anti-vaccination websites are closely interconnected, with many cross-references. At the same time, there are virtually no links to scientific literature.
Many modern anti-vaccinationists practice the use of alternative methods with unproven effectiveness instead of vaccination and therefore have a material interest in the population refusing vaccinations.
The closed nature of anti-vaccination communities, blind faith in the correctness of the "guru," and a biased attitude towards any opinions in support of vaccination (conspiracy theory: doctors are bribed by vaccine manufacturers), as well as the harm caused to health, allow us to see in such communities signs of totalitarian sects.