Yesterday, that madman (ariputra) promised not to write anything more:smile28:
But, as we can see, an addict can't go without his fix:smile52:
Added 1 minute ago
Again, some copy-pasted thoughts and words from others, just like that idiot! Imagine, a parrot trained by ariputra (if he had one):rolleyes: ? "Squawk-squawk-squawk! Squawk-squawk-squawk! Destroy! Terror! Glorious Russia! Hari Krishna, Hari Rama, Christ is Risen, Perun, come!"
Regarding the highlighted part: drinking "without stopping" and "culturally" – in my opinion, you need to be completely out of your mind ("YOUR mind is the king in your head";) (s), to confuse these things, to listen to some pseudo-professor with pseudo-statistics and pseudo-scientific "lectures". I never had the impression that they drank non-stop for centuries in Russia; I don't know what idiotic sources led someone to such an opinion?! But they weren't teetotalers either; they drank ecologically pure, low-alcohol beverages ("mead-beer," etc.) on holidays – that is, culturally, as understood by modern, reasonable people. I don't understand: is Professor Preobrazhensky and Dr. Bormental in the movie "The Dog's Heart" just a bunch of drunkards, no better than Sharikov:eek: ? Both of them are "stealing" and "stealing":rolleyes: ... Okay, now the logic of ariputra's sympathy for the obvious :smile04: :smile04: :smile04: is clear – if a real professor, probably an alcoholic, sold out to the Jews for booze and a warm place (if he isn't Jewish himself!), says that elephants cannot be launched into orbit by spinning them around their trunk, our hero will definitely not consider his opinion more important than the opinion of some newly-minted internet-Sharikov, but a teetotaler (and what am I kidding, he will praise Sharikov, and if Sharikov is also religious, then he is a prophet, no less:smile41: !). If that's the case, then I have no more questions.