numOne
Auto-translated
Psychological portrait? Pete, I'm sorry, but does it really matter what kind of person he is?
I don't remember you ever creating a psychological portrait in previous investigations...
Kilgore and Co., what the hell are you dragging personal financial matters into?
These are his problems, and he should solve them himself. Either he has a conscience or he doesn't, but you're planning to ban him for it. Putting a "black mark" on him as an organizer is one thing, but banning him as a player is absurd.
As for Vigo and Vigoboy, even if they helped him in the past, so what?
A few years ago, my father was also registered on HP, and due to unforeseen circumstances, I had to play a couple of games for him or make a few moves. Is that grounds for a ban? He's an amateur now, plays against the AI, sometimes watches my games while having a beer, and even gave me advice on Facebook about a spell he couldn't figure out himself. We even won that Facebook game.
I know of other players who have similar situations, but I won't bring them up.
Furthermore, a maphack that isn't 100% proven isn't considered a maphack. I didn't detect any here, and while the circumstances are strange, there were millions of similar strange occurrences before the saves were compromised, and many of those players are still playing now...
If you're so sure about Vigo's maphack, then require him to play with password-protected saves. What's the problem?
Conclusion: Vigo may not have great skills or a strong conscience, but putting a "black mark" on him based on "trifles" is ridiculous.
And we're not going to put a "black mark" on him; we'll just issue a permanent ban from all official Tournaments (including the season). We're only offering this concession because he's a "good-natured" person.
And everything would be understandable – making him play with password-protected saves, etc. – if he played himself.
Пусть мой враг будет силен и страшен. Если я поборю его, то не буду чувствовать стыда.