Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I came back and checked – that’s how it is. He’s not a moderator. The only answer that came to my mind to the question “Why does he need this?” is that he wants to become a moderator.
Probably, for this purpose, he recently asked the Creator to remove his moderator status.
In the third game, there’s a completely different “system.”
You can say that about any section; they all have their own “system.” No, I completely agree with Siver, and I think it’s strange that there can be any doubts here. One thing is to help, point out violations, and maybe even give advice on how to proceed in some special cases. It’s completely different to do something on your own; it’s simply a sign of disrespect to the local moderators.
Until I pointed out those obvious violations, no one even bothered to delete or edit them. And there were moderators at the time.
Well, that’s great! They just overlooked it; what can you do? The section is complex; people talk a lot, and sometimes you can miss something. That’s why the “brick” under the messages is actually needed.