To Vigo or not to Vigo? That is the question.

Well, here's one with SEM_56 in the season (our newcomers will probably burst out laughing now):

Quote:
"SEM_56 (blue, swamp, Tazar, Tazar) def Vigo (red, castle, Valeska, Valeska) 2SM4d(3) 212

That's it. The draft looked decent at first glance too — two external dwellings of horses and an external dwelling of angels. But on the second look, after scouting the secondary respawn on the surface and the underground one — I realized there were no prospects. Not a single Slow or Haste in any castle or shrines on three respawns!
On the fourth, I gathered all the preserves and headed towards ГО, there was nowhere else to go.
16 birds easily take down 110 kitties even without magic, though there's little point; Tazik got a big chocolate bar from the respawn and packed himself to the fullest. No chance, thanks for the game, well played, excellent tempo!"

This is insane — "on the fourth, I gathered all the preserves, excellent tempo!" — 2SM4d(3) 212.

Petya, do you think this is a gathering of idiots here?
It says "thanks for the game, well played, excellent tempo." Who is that addressed to? Who is he saying "thanks for the game" to? He's praising the opponent for an excellent game, and you just spliced phrases from two places and started making fun! Don't do that, it's unbecoming of you...

The statistics are laughable. Look at my game statistics in the season and in the tournament. About 40% in the first case and 100% in the second. So what? Maybe I was maphacking at Slugfest?
And back in 1998-1999, I think I had about 55% in regular chess-like games and 100% in team games. So what? Maybe, you statisticians, I was maphacking the opponent's brain or maybe I was disguising Kasparov as myself?

This tribunal is utterly disgusting. When one person maphacks in plain sight, he gets away with it easily. Another person is almost erased from the face of the Earth just on suspicion. But do you know what the truth is? I know, and you won't erase me that easily!! The truth is simply that those who lost, let's say, to Vitalik, are so confident in their own invincibility that they're ready to assume anything except one simple fact. In this particular game, he played better. They can't even imagine such a thing; the disease of "megalomania" (delusions of grandeur) hasn't been cancelled. So they start making up all sorts of things. Next, they'll say Vitalik was hypnotizing his opponents through Hamachi. And what? With their logic, that's a normal next step.

It's useless to shut me up. I've had enough.