Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
In this case, I think it would be better to replace the word "may" with the word "should." The question of removing the moderator from their position should be raised. Because it is completely wrong when a person almost completely neglects the forum and leaves, but remains a moderator. Of course, there are situations when a person is forced for some reason not to visit the forum for several months, which is why the question of removal from the position is raised, and not removed automatically.
I would say that this is aesthetically unappealing... Moderators, while constantly offline, certainly won't be able to harm anyone, but the fact that they clutter up the statistics with their usernames is somewhat wrong.