Sash, if it weren't utter nonsense, I wouldn't be saying it. Everything is as I said. And I've already provided arguments; you just don't want to see them. I've said it before: 60/40 with a non-buggy quick cast and 75/25 with a buggy one. Everyone knows what the results of a buggy quick cast can be, and using it is really a gamble, as it's not always reliable. They made it initially just as reliable, and people started using RC5 on their computers. And after that, you talk about fairness? People are giving up on half the features for the sake of a reliable old quick cast, arguing that it saves time.
Read the post above; what's unclear about it?
I'm reading the thread thoroughly from the beginning. I haven't seen a single coherent argument. Just fluff. IMHO.