Skip to content
#245
Auto-translated
Lider1
expensive in terms of money or resources
In terms of resources, OBS is completely free (although it currently has Beta status).

I had to set settings that my computer can't handle. For me, the ideal is how I see it. Sometimes the computer lacks the power, sometimes the internet, and Justin himself doesn't support large amounts of data. More precisely, there is a certain bitrate limit, beyond which it simply doesn't make sense, because you can't get a large bitrate for one free channel, which causes freezes. Mostly, it's just a loss of frames, from 5 to 10 per second. But the picture itself is excellent, and most importantly, there is no blurring during fast movement.
For those interested: Preset — Medium, Bitrate — 5000 kbps, Quality — 10, FPS — 33 (here you can also use 25, but there is not much difference).
Increasing the FPS will allow you to avoid a large number of drops. That is, there will be losses, the same 5-10 frames per second, but this is 20% of 25 fps and 10% of 50 fps, for example. But, as you understand, a good-quality image (let's say png) will weigh about 100 kb. We multiply this by the number of frames, and we get 2500-5000 kb. Not every internet channel can afford such a speed, moreover, Justin himself is unlikely to be able to process such an amount of information. By the way, the VOD will be recorded quite well, it will just weigh a lot. But online viewing will inevitably lag, and this is still more important for a streamer. Therefore, I will have to reduce the quality, but this is not my way) So, I need to come up with something.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: Emil