Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Eight people can gather without any official organizations, discuss everything among themselves, and have fun playing against each other. Let's not forget that the resource is publicly available, and discriminatory tournaments that restrict someone's participation for any reason are not right. In principle, this also applies to Nooma's idea to organize a tournament for exactly 16 people, taking into account the rating of a friendly, but not decisive, resource. Therefore, any suggestions for the structure of new tournaments are undoubtedly useful and needed, but I repeat, the tournaments should be publicly accessible.
Damn, whoever gets there first gets to play, and you don't necessarily have to wait for the end of one tournament to start the next. You can run them in parallel - but here, you definitely won't get 16 people. There are ICQ - I asked the players - that's it, the tournament is ready - and months of registration are not needed for it. The fact that it is placed on the resource is just for the convenience of the players and the 'feeling of officiality'.