Auto-translated
In HD, I won't be making changes for every little thing, for every minor adjustment to an option, as some would like.
First, it's technically more complex, more labor-intensive, and time-consuming.
1. Don't introduce the most controversial fixes.
2. Spend time and introduce them as optional.
3. Introduce them rigidly and hope that the gaming community will come to its senses and start playing with them. At the same time, it is obvious that the hope is all the less, the more controversial the changes are.
Secondly, I don't understand the point of choosing: play SoD with X or Y percent of fixes. If it's going to be bug-free, then it should be bug-free; otherwise - with the original bugs.
At the very least, there is a problem with a comprehensive and universally accepted list of bugs that need to be fixed. For some, the sulfur in the nagabank is a bug, and for others, the damage from towers.
In my opinion, it's not worth lumping everything together; there are features, bugs, BUGS, BUGS, etc.
And I don't understand the indignation about the fact that in order to play with some features with an opponent, you need to negotiate.
No one is surprised that in order to play with Conflict, collections, and other additions and fixes, you need to persuade your opponent to play SoD, and not RoE, or if you want to play with the features of WoG, you need to persuade them to play WoG, and not SoD.
However, SoD cannot play with RoE according to the rules of RoE, and WoG cannot play with SoD according to the rules of SoD. But HD+ can play with SoD according to the rules of SoD - and this is a big, in my opinion, convenience.
Награда: Лучшему игроку сезона Осень 2009 за замок Конфлюкс