I can read and understand the meaning of what is written. The problem is that in your case, it wasn't actually written, but rather implied (since your specific post about the streams didn't mention it at all).

Now, learn to read and understand: after Tinker's explanations, you stopped writing about "blah, blah, blah, he answers strangely (or, on the contrary, correctly and eloquently)." And then you posted that he can honestly win.

You just need to not "imply" (so that you can later "gracefully backpedal" from the conversation), but write specifically. Otherwise, it's like you're writing about a grandmother, but implying that she has testicles:D And then you say: you don't understand anything, I was writing about a grandfather!!!

If you discuss one person's actions from a negative point of view, but don't make the same assessment of the second person, then you are, in fact, informally acknowledging one as a cheater and providing arguments in favor of the other. So, who among us doesn't understand what is written and doesn't read the posts?:-)