Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
No, Vic, you're wrong here. Many players have their own style; the devil is in the details.
For example, I almost always take a Peasant to become a Scholar, even though I know that most players would never do that (because it's considered a useless skill). But I'm hoping that the Scholar will give me +1 skill (according to probability theory, this is very likely).
And in the game where someone was criticized for taking Tactics at level 4-5 instead of Air Magic, I would have taken Tactics too.
As practice shows, it's almost impossible to 100% prove that someone is cheating (even remember the case with the great Alex), but the details and nuances help us, as well as the intuition of many players.
Дипломатия - искусство говорить собаке "хорошая собачка" до тех пор пока не найдешь подходящую палку.