Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
You are describing a situation where, in private, the decision of whether or not to take a restart is almost a coin toss. That is, you can flip a coin and decide based on what it shows.
But the same situation, when made public, may no longer be close to a coin toss, but could be very bad (and a restart should be taken) or good (you should keep playing).
If, within the context of a single game, he could simply guess, because based on the available information, it was 50/50, then if you look at five games and it turns out that in all 5 games he was randomly guessing the right moments for a restart, then it is no longer correct to explain this as luck; you need to look for more plausible explanations, such as map hacking.
That is, I'm saying that how a player takes restarts should also be analyzed. Although a single game may not be enough for this.