I've always had a simple stance, even though I'm clueless about organizational matters. Since you're judging, treat everyone equally. And regarding the last phrase – you're right. I don't play Mafia and can't determine anything virtually; I'm all for real-life interaction. But I know one thing: in the Rebe situation, those who were to some extent responsible should have been the ones to suffer. And lo and behold! Neo argued with Pete, and Sticky is closing the tournament... Just as the Rebe situation was initially a farce, that's how it should have ended. As for a constructive position and whining – that's exactly what the parties involved in this "affair" are doing. It's all based on emotions. And as an outside observer, I only feel sorry for one thing: that STICKY didn't take everything into his own hands but is instead swayed by emotions or something else. The tournament should be completed in any case, and this "mess" should serve as a manual for all future organizers. I just don't understand one thing, Yura. Do you think it was necessary to simply watch the events unfold, remain silent, and pretend that the disqualification was justified? What do you consider constructive – analyzing saves and expressing a subjective opinion? That's what the judges should do. BUT, if they do it without much argumentation and further consistency in their decisions? Because, as I understand it, what happened between Neo and Pete doesn't concern Rebe's disqualification; it's just emotions and hysteria and has nothing to do with the matter.