Neoandy
Auto-translated
I expect consistency in judging. And I asked the question solely because of your previous post.
Wasn't the situation with Rebellius as you described in this post? Only 3-4 people looked at it, and then they immediately started making decisions. What could be simpler? And the decision regarding the timeline was quite hasty.
They said A, so they should say B. Ban the Chinese player. Or is what happened with Rebellius not enough in this situation?
Firstly, the decisions were made exclusively by those who were authorized to do so, after carefully reviewing the save files and Rebellius's explanations for each episode. If Rebellius's explanations were not available on the forum, it doesn't mean he didn't provide them. And the judges based their decisions on those explanations, not on what people are trying to formulate here after the fact.
Secondly, the timeline regarding Rebellius omits an important fact: it started not a week before the verdict, but even after the games with BK in the first round. As I understand it, the person was given another opportunity to "prove himself." After the games with Pete, the second round began, and the decision was made based on the overall situation. Therefore, there was no rush.
Thirdly, the fact that the Chinese player is not being banned immediately does not mean that the judges have forgotten the alphabet. He still has 1 or 2 games in the current round, which could provide good additional information, supplementing the save files already received. As a result of a ban, he will face the same fate as Reba. So why deprive him of the opportunity to obtain additional save files? - that's right, there's no reason to. Therefore, there is no need to provoke anyone; everything is proceeding as it should (at least, that's how it seems to me; I am not part of the judging panel, but only as an active player, I express my opinion, including on the save files, which (opinion) does not obligate anyone to anything).
P.S.: Our task here is to discuss the save files, to express all the pros and cons. There is an opportunity to do this, as the "suspect" does not read this forum. Instead, some people, hopefully unintentionally, reduce everything to the slogan: "if there is a complaint, a ban is needed!", implying inconsistency in decision-making if this is not done. At the same time, they do not take into account the different stages at which this process is.
