Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
There are situations where an error occurs at night, there are no judges available, and everyone is on edge, including because of these various disputes. People don't want to postpone the game, or they might not have time to play later, and it's unclear when they'll be able to. We need to identify a group of about 10-15 qualified players who can always be available to help review save files and have the authority to review the disputed situation at that moment, so that everyone can continue playing immediately.
I strongly disagree with this. The decision should be made by the judge (or judges) who is officially selected for the tournament. Some "authorities" should not interfere in someone else's business. If they can't agree, they should postpone the game.