Skip to content
#864
Auto-translated
ariputra

Well, I really did think that you cleared the guards and just didn’t want to go there, considering that I saw this area from my vantage point at 121. I admit that from the outside, it all looked at least very strange and suspicious. Frequent disconnects on my part added to the fatigue, plus we were playing at night, so I got tired and made a mistake.

Thirdly, I acknowledged this fact immediately after you told me about it.
I won’t even mention the strangeness and suspiciousness of the whole game, because there’s no smoke without fire, and here there was a blatant violation of the rules. The rules are below, and the fact that the opponent acknowledges this is above. I don’t have time to make screenshots of my messages to the judges right now, and there’s no point in it. As for the fact that GOД appeared online at 3 a.m. and didn’t respond, I don’t understand what this picture is supposed to prove, and this history of the ICQ chat doesn’t show him being online. I even sent him about 12 authorization requests. And in general, what difference does it make what happened after that? As for the victory, I play for fun, and this game didn’t bring me any pleasure, it just annoyed me from the very beginning (there’s also a history of that), but there’s no need to bring that up here. We’re talking about a violation, and you admitted it. I don’t see any point in dragging this out any further. And these excuses about “I thought,” when you had several vantage points and could see my moves starting from when I left the spawn, but you didn’t look at them. Why? You were watching a movie, preparing to rush, and you weren’t paying attention to what Valya was doing, who she was attacking, and where she was running. If you have nothing to say, it’s better to stay silent and admit defeat than to post some incomprehensible pictures where you didn’t get a response in ICQ and come up with some made-up excuses. There are rules, and there is a violation.

5.6.5. It is allowed to pass by the guards of a passage without destroying them, if
- the player has already passed through this passage (i.e., destroyed one of the guards);
- the player saw the opponent destroy one of the guards or pass through this passage;
- there is other irrefutable evidence that the guard was destroyed.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: Emil

Users Online 3 users 1298 guests