Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
So that later people can point at this topic and say that I'm using my personal authority for my own purposes? Haha.
Arandor, people are already pointing. But if you did that, you would be doing a good deed for Tox by creating a poll for him.
It's strange that Zubr supported the proposal, because this introduction will create a lot of topics, among which it will be difficult to navigate.
The idea is that there won't be a lot of topics under any circumstances: topics for the Mafia will simply be created in advance and initially have a different purpose. So their number will not change in the end.
Why should I resolve my conflicts personally? I want people to know about the moderator's actions that serve their personal interests.
You want public opinion to support you, to say that "Arandor is right, and everyone who argues is a noob and a loser." And when it doesn't support you very much, you just shout louder in an attempt to prove how righteous and innocent you are. But if you can't solve your problems on your own and without extreme measures, that doesn't speak well of you. -----------
That's what you're saying now. If such a situation happened unexpectedly and before this case, you would definitely have acted differently.
Don't judge everyone by yourself; I have no doubt that Ver would have acted as she said.