Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
How does this follow? If we don't consider the method of elimination right now.
Hostor, damn it... -___- Vinta is responsible for patents on fake deaths, which indicates the role of the murdered. There is no evidence because an assassin cut/bruised him, and then someone from the shooters shot the dead Rimpel. But it was already too late, and evidence is not given for unsuccessful murders.
My version: the scratches are a hint at the role of the murdered, and Vinta was the one who killed him. No evidence was given because it was a fake murder, and Vinta didn't want to provide any. That's when, in my opinion, everything fits together.