Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer commented on this monologue as follows: "Our state is so miserable that it should undoubtedly be preferred to complete non-existence. If suicide really promised us this and we were faced with the alternative of 'to be or not to be' in the full sense of the word, then it should undoubtedly be preferred as the most desirable conclusion" (73, p. 424). "But people," Schopenhauer writes, "usually do not associate death with absolute annihilation; there has not yet been a single person who would not want to live until tomorrow" (426)[3].
I still don't see the connection. If I want, information about my interpretation can appear in the wiki immediately after Schopenhauer's, but this doesn't create a connection between me and Shakespeare.
- 1 mafia - there will be a murder. - maniac - there will be no murders. Forget about the probabilities of them murdering mafia roles - they are less significant than the numbers show.