Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
{A hand reaches for a picture with a facepalm. No, I won't stoop to that! No! Aaaah, how difficult!} Seriously, science can't disprove or prove this, and I can even prove that science can't. It simply doesn't align with the physical capabilities of a person. Sometimes it's useful to know what a person can actually study based on the scientific method, and where the limits of their capabilities lie.
But here's the catch. Either we believe that it's possible to fully understand the structure of the Universe (and thus prove/disprove the existence of God), or we are weak-willed agnostics and believe in the incomprehensibility of the world.