Oops, it looks like two people are trying to frame me at once. One of them is someone who "visited Gil" (it's strange that it wasn't mentioned in the newspaper, right?), and the other is Gil himself. It seems the mafia hoped to divert suspicion from themselves. Although, Gil might just be a Barbarian; who knows?

1. The newspaper checks aren't displayed, so there's nothing strange about that.
2. Surprisingly, there are very few notes with the results. A white-collar worker, a waiter, and only two notes in total. I don't see any confusing moves from the mafia. Most likely, at least one of the notes can be trusted – it's hard to believe that both roles are being played by fools who don't write notes.
3. The fact that a checker is going to come to me, if that's true, doesn't surprise me at all. Rather, I'm surprised that you, Ple-Sen, were visited on the first night, and I was left for the next round. :D
4. I wouldn't call it a Barbarian. It's quite a reasonable solution to a moderately difficult clue. It wasn't obvious, but it wasn't too hard either.

Now I'm going to analyze the newspaper in more detail.