Imagining something is not the same as arguing. I'm talking about how you perceive Necromancers as "white and fluffy." Some people see them differently. That's fine, but when you try to argue your point, it looks, frankly, ridiculous. I'm saying that Necromancers are subscribers to the "Necromania" magazine. Prove me wrong.

We're not arguing about Necromancers; we're arguing about the fact that not everything that seems like a knight is good and wholesome, and that great deeds are not always done loudly and publicly, but quietly and discreetly. And I don't think they're "white and fluffy"; some things, despite their repulsiveness, are very necessary. And by the way, subscribers to the "Necromania" magazine are not necessarily necrophiles. And in what way do you find it funny? I don't understand.