Max, you should learn how to play before making definitive judgments about the strength of factions and other things. It's a bit amusing to read how someone who doesn't understand the turn order in battle tries to assess the balance, for example, by arguing with Stinger. In particular, if you played SOD better, you would understand that necromancy in its current form gives much more disadvantages and makes the game poorer.

Call Prokhorov, who didn't play basketball, or Serdyukov (a businessman and head of the Ministry of Defense) and say the same things. You don't have to be a TOP player to judge. As far as I know, not all athletes are good coaches, and vice versa.

The fact that I don't know something, I ask. Don't worry about the skill, I have many chances to increase it, considering that I strive to improve it. All questions are aimed at learning something new, which is a sign of striving, not noobism.

Message from Dirty_Player:
Where did you get this information from? Do you think that Necropolis is the weakest in WoG?

And in general, Oelm is right. I said this a few pages ago. Play a hundred or two games in WoG first, and then you will have a more realistic idea. Maybe even about morale.

Wait a minute, what does it mean he's right? He said the same things that I said earlier. Maybe the problem is that it's hard to accept the correctness of a newbie? And it's very easy and painless to tell any newcomer to go and learn. Well, I'm learning and I will continue to do so, I will play in WoG too - I will understand the difference in more detail, but in general, I, as an ignorant person, already have many supporters in terms of understanding the game. I communicate not only on the forum, but also in ICQ with many people, in any case, including those who are far from being newbies, and I know how to listen to them, make assessments, my statements are not only the result of my personal views. I think I said that. And now, should I shut up and not complain? You wrote 10 posts on the forum in response to me, but in ICQ I gained knowledge equivalent to thousands of posts.

Don't compare skill and views. It's clear that when you don't know the details, your assessment may be incorrect, but the path is always difficult, and if I make statements and the TOP player can't convince me (or the majority), how can this TOP player be trusted? In terms of the game, yes, he is an ace, but in terms of organizational work and the validity of arguments?
And finally, if my statements cause a resonance, then they mean something, so we will continue. And I accept advice and learn, the only question is what kind of advice it is... like "shut up, noob" or "here, please read." The difference is obvious.

I'm not saying that he is weak in WoG. I'm talking about SOD. That he will be an outsider. We can argue about this or not, but it is clear that the race will become much weaker.

P.S. I made a mistake in the reply. The fact that Oelm pointed out my lack of knowledge in the game is clear to me and was done in a normal way, and I personally strive for this, so I will also ask questions, develop, learn to play, and maybe you yourself will not be able to stand against me in the game someday))) that's all.