R55Max

Maybe you're reading between the lines, but I've said more than once that I see drawbacks in both versions, but I love and play both equally. It's just that, at the moment, there are more serious opponents in WoG. This is the deciding factor. I certainly don't try to convince anyone that WoG is better than SoD.

I'm not against keeping morale; I think it's not essential, but I also think it's silly to claim that it's the main feature of SoD.

A newcomer's interest in Heroes isn't sparked by winning against their father due to a random factor, but by developing their own strategy for playing the game, which can compete with their father's game. This is my dogma. I came to Heroes late, and I lost a lot of money in the game betting on the Chaos League because I was a complete newbie, but I developed my own style and understanding of the game, honed my combat skills, read manuals, and watched other players, asking questions. As a result, I started beating them. That's what I call a newcomer's interest, not a random win against their father due to some factor like morale. They win once, believe in their abilities, and then lose 100 games without any chance or desire to improve. That's what I'm against, so I want people to grow in their understanding of the game itself, not in their worship of the original SoD's features.