Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
The works of Fyodor Mikhailovich (of course, Dostoevsky!).
So "close to the text" that it's sickening. I realized with this series that an adaptation should be a composition based on the book, not a retelling. Essentially, this is a smooth, polished summary – but why do I need it if I've already read the book twenty times?
Where is the director's own interpretation of the idea? Did he have his own thoughts about the book? Where are they?
There is a valid point here, but the usual problem with films is that they omit too much, not that they add their own interpretations. The narrative becomes incomplete.