Mafia: general discussions.

Once again...
Player Hryusha receives a modkill for the action "nh" (not good :D). Subsequently, he realizes that he shouldn't do that because he will receive a modkill for it.

But the modkill was not given, huh. That is, now you can continue to do this, because there was no punishment?

The strict wording of the rules applies, within the framework of this forum, for tournaments, but not for games like this, which primarily serve as entertainment.

Why is that? I repeat, where did I make anything stricter? Show me a specific point in my version of the rule. I'm not trying to cancel the fun. And, as I said, my version is just a differently written old rule. It doesn't cancel the fun, it just more clearly formulates an existing restriction. Does anyone find it fun to do things like this? If not, then I don't understand the protest.

And preventing this in this way is generally ungrateful, because next time there will be another loophole, then a third, and so on.

Let them try. I have limited most of the ways to violate the rules that can be called not too harsh. A loophole will already be a harsh violation, that's all.

And if the GM decides, then his decision is equivalent to the rule in any case.
Yes, there is also such a thing as doubt. Well, it's a pity to give, for example, a modkill, because it's just a game, or a novice GM is afraid that the players will then make claims to him. Overcoming such doubts will also be helped by a modkill in some previous game, based on the logic of "it was already like that".

Again, it turns out that "it hasn't happened before." No modkill was issued. And now, every time a GM feels sorry for a player, should they break the rules?

P.S. I don't want to turn this into an argument. If someone is firmly convinced that there is no need to change the rule, but does not want to provide scientific arguments, then there is no need to argue with me and engage in demagoguery. I don't want that. Right now, I specifically want to understand where people see the problem. Namely, where is the rule being made stricter in my version. If there is a specific tightening, we will discuss it and remove it if necessary.