Offline tournament "Evil Lands".

Good day to you, dear IronAxe!
P.S. What do you think about a description of this tournament?:) (A more detailed one than in your previous post, after the tournament is over)

I've said it several times already about my attitude towards descriptions. If I make it into the top three, I'll provide a more detailed one. Otherwise (if a player doesn't make it to the top but still provides a description), it won't be of much interest. It's up to them – if someone wants to, let them write it.
Special attention should be paid to the description of the player who took first place. In the event that one of the leaders (2nd or 3rd place) wants to repeat the Walkthrough based on the winner's description, the leader should be required to provide complete information about the Walkthrough, in such detail that the person repeating it can actually FOLLOW THE WALKTHROUGH based on their description.
I emphasize this especially because the leader's description, made available for everyone to see, may not be enough to repeat the Walkthrough.

I even suggest that you include this in the rules for running tournaments, so that requests to the leader for clarification on the Walkthrough are of a completely official nature. You have something similar in the rules, but it's a bit different; it only applies to players suspected of cheating. But why should we suspect the leader of cheating? And if a player just wants to play the map following the winner's path – they can check it out at the same time :)