Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Lizard, keep it up! By the way, I can somewhat formulate a hypothesis (not my own, I heard it from Keku in the "scientific non-fiction" program; there are many interesting, although unproven, ideas there) that explains movement at superluminal speed. If we take General Relativity (Einstein's, yes, yes, his! So there are no contradictions!), then gravity "distorts" the surrounding space. If we take our spaceship, place a huge mass on its nose, and a huge negative mass on its tail, then the spaceship will create two folds. The front one will shorten the distance from it to the destination point, and the rear one will perform the opposite function. Something like that. Wiki
leads to causal paradoxes (such as, for example, an observer sending a signal to their own past).
I did find an error in Wiki. Our professor clearly proved that there is no such paradox in Special Relativity, because by the time the signal reaches its destination, the event will already have happened. Here.
Added 2 minutes ago Vayshan
Large Flying Immaterial Pink Elephants
If your address were "Voronezh," I would definitely say that I know you.
Added 3 minutes ago Vayshan
However, modern science adheres to his old theory, doesn't it? And he didn't "say" it, but scientifically substantiated his theory, if you want to get technical.
Einstein became famous for breaking stereotypes. I'm sure he wouldn't want to create new ones. The theory works as long as we can ignore the error it gives in the case of experimental verification.