Мафия 23. The Rockland tavern

I have a rhetorical question: what were you doing with me before you killed me and after the murder? :smile04:

I wasn't even there...

Regarding today's clues.
There are 2 clues:
1) The inscription "Ironfist"
2) A headdress resembling a fur hat.

One of these clues was planted, the other is genuine.

Now let's consider 2 scenarios:
1) If we assume that I am the Mafia. And I planted one of these clues myself.
Let's consider this scenario.
I would not have planted the "Ironfist" clue in any case (I don't seem to be suicidal)
So I planted the fur hat.
The question arises: Who did I want to frame with this hat?
TaKo? But her cap doesn't look like a fur hat at all.
Maybe I just wanted to confuse people? But that doesn't make sense, considering that I was almost executed yesterday; I should have framed someone with additional evidence then.
If I were the Mafia, I would have planted something better, for example, a regular, non-fur hat, and now I would be writing accusations against TaKo with a smart look.

2) Now let's consider the scenario if I am an innocent.
In this case, the planted clue is "Ironfist".
It is already clear what purpose the Mafia had in planting this clue and who they wanted to frame with it. I have already written about this.

Dear citizens, think about this.
Answer these two questions for yourself (you don't even have to write about it in the thread): which of these clues was planted, and what did the Mafia want to achieve by planting this clue?