Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
It's unlikely that Kyle is the Mafia. It's too obvious that he's draining mana in the first night; he traditionally has an advantage in the complexity of clues compared to the Mafia.
Registr
The rules state:
1) reveals the role of the killer if he observes him at the moment of committing the crime or his victim.
2) can replace the clue left at the crime scene by the killer with his own (even a very easy one); if the killer does not use an additional clue, the thief can also leave his own (i.e., the main thing is that there are not three clues at once).
That is, he only learns the role of the killer.
The killer's nickname remains unknown to him...
I don't understand. Doesn't he know perfectly well who he's observing?