If we consider the scenario of Necromancers versus Haven on the Outlands map, judging by your comments, you seem to underestimate the Necromancer. Although this map has an undeniable advantage for the Knight – 2 gold mines – nevertheless, based on my experience playing on this map in the late game against fairly strong opponents, I can say that the chances of Haven winning are about 40%, no more. This is assuming that Haven is at the top and the Necromancer is at the bottom. But if the Necromancer is at the top, then Haven's chances are practically zero. Of course, a lot depends on the availability of spells. It seems you like to develop in the Light. That's good if you have Anti-Magic, but what if you don't? Secondly, a stack of 1000 zombies under Orson can easily withstand a charge from 300 Axel's Knights led by Isabelle. This is to say that you think you can wipe out the strongest enemy stack with a single breath. Thirdly, while you're busy rushing Paladins, the Necromancer is subduing and berserking everyone else, and the Paladins will most likely be defeated after their first attack. I won't go into detail about the Necromancer's tactics against the Knight; I think it's unnecessary, although you can stick to your opinion. Yes, a lot can be done with Anti-Magic and with a different setup. Moreover, judging by your development, you don't seem to be planning on getting an education, and that means a lot. P.S. I described the Knight's tactics against the Necromancer (practically the only one that can be used to win) above.