Enough with stating the obvious. We don't need to enhance Necromancy without increasing Mana. Why pay more if the result is the same?

We don't pay more (or less) for building a tower – its cost is the same regardless of the development path. And the result is not the same (for comparison, kill peasants before building the tower, and then kill them again after; the difference will be in the suggested number of units that can be raised). Enhancing "Necromancy" is an important factor, but if someone stubbornly doesn't think it's necessary to note this, then that's their right. My task is to explain the benefits of enhancement to those who are interested. If someone is doing well without enhancement, no one forces them to enhance "Necromancy" (and therefore, striving for "Lord of the Dead" is pointless for them – because they still don't plan to take advantage of this enhancement).

Really? I was only talking about the main criterion.
And also: With Necromancy already enhanced, but without Mana, who will we raise?

I have repeatedly tried to convey the main idea – it is more important not the number of Mana points (especially since in the first/second week, its amount will be approximately the same with any development scheme), but its beneficial investment.

I explained. If it's not clear: the main criterion for the uselessness of the skill is:
- Comparing it with other skills that we could take + "unnecessary enhancement"
And otherwise, everything depends on many factors, but this does not make the difficulty of upgrading only the 3rd most important thing... the conclusions are obvious...
secondary factors are no longer of great importance with a greater variety of the first ones. Therefore, under certain conditions, as described above, the difficulty of obtaining it is not expressed in this sense. Some blame Lordesat, but they themselves stand on a lame point of view, and are looking for excuses....
I will repeat once again: you cannot compare something that gives with nothing. You always need to compare with the available options.
I am ending this one-on-one discussion, because it is pointless to continue in this situation, and it is also off-topic :(
Let everyone decide what is more important to them...

I see the comparison with nothing in your reasoning – "we don't need to enhance Necromancy, we don't use it" and so on – I am trying to clarify my position regarding the unsubstantiated thesis about the uselessness of the "Lord of the Dead" skill, because it is quite obvious to me that a certain number of players do not have sufficient information about the game mechanics.