Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
No, that guy knew what he was doing. He went from 2400+ to 2199, and in the end, he won 5 out of 5 games. If it weren't for the judges, he would have won 100%. Although, by the way, the case is in court, and it seems he's winning, so it's not just in Heroes that it's hard to prove cheating:D P.S. And "Evil Romantic" sounds cool:D
I, for example, don't consider this cheating. He played fairly; he moved the pieces, not a bot. Where's the cheating? This isn't cheating; it's a loophole in the rules.