Auto-translated
This was kind of a hint about herd instinct. Which should be and is annoying when communicating with them and others.
Those who served in the army know well: 1 Chechen in a company is a normal guy, 2 Chechens in a company are a source of problems, 3 Chechens in a company are a natural disaster.
But what does AK have to do with it?
Compare this to the position of Alex's defenders – almost everyone goes into battle on their own, with their own arguments.
Now imagine that we've moved on from Alex's case, forgotten it, and moved on. Life goes on, new problems arise. Let's say that AK, which was formed in this way, starts to do something to you. You go to them for explanations, but there's a closed door, a vague protocol on the wall, and the phones aren't answered. What will you do?
Added 5 minutes ago
That's right. But you've written about a dozen similar posts, and Britva has written only one, so I don't think it's unfair.
They're accusing me of being a chatterbox with April theses, even though I actually bring new examples, arguments, and associations every time, and I'm using my literary talent, but AK and its defenders are stuck in a closed loop of "everything is fine, stay calm, go back to your rooms, the party and the government take care of you, everything is fine, stay calm, go back to your rooms, etc."
And in his post, there is a candidate that wasn't mentioned before, but in yours, I didn't find anything.
Added 1 minute ago
Listen, enough already, okay?
First one, then another... Should I close the thread if I step away for a couple of hours? I'm going to bed soon, have fun... I'll wake up and delete everything without reading it :)