Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
P.S. When Vitalik's case was being investigated, a public opinion poll was conducted, and it very accurately reflected the opinion of the players – not a single vote against, more than half in favor, and a few abstentions. I'm just wondering – why wasn't a public opinion poll conducted this time? Could it be because it's clear that the result would likely be the opposite?
I don't understand why a public opinion poll is needed? :confused: The Administration Council decided by vote that there was no cheating (4-3). I see the situation differently: we need to determine the measure of punishment for unsportsmanlike conduct. Let's discuss that instead, if you're interested. Oelm
Yura, there is no bias. It's just that the decision had to be one, and it has been made. Although, as I understand it, the question of unfair play should have been decided by a general vote. Why did the Administration Council take it upon itself to decide this?
Pasha, we investigate many cases of unfair play. Each member of the Administration Council is often sent some save files with suspicions, which the Administration Council rejects. If we hold a vote for every case, it will be complete nonsense!
