Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

I couldn't quite grasp the arguments of the accusation. They are very vague and ambiguous. We need logs, save files, and witness testimonies. Without that, unfortunately, it's just a case of "puffing up the hat." Based on what's presented, I don't see any contradictions with the version: "a Guest arrived, Player 1 stepped away, the Guest looked at the map." Moreover, it seems strange to me that Player 1, who launched the game, would brazenly start looking at the map. From my own experience, I know that the fact of the stream puts pressure on your mind, plus there's communication with viewers on ICQ, so it's impossible to forget about this fact. And in general, why stream a game if you're going to cheat? But the Guest didn't know that a stream was in progress, so he could have looked at the map. Furthermore, it's written that Player 1 created the game. Why would he need to enter the codes once, then load the game and enter them again? It's easier to just look at everything in the editor right away, from the start. But the Guest, who didn't know who was hosting and didn't want to rummage through the map folder, could have looked at it in this way. P.S. Pasha, please be more careful with the argumentation in such matters. Ideally, it should be in the style of a police report - verbatim witness statements + objective facts that contradict the statements. In the presented text, everything is too vague and allows for many different interpretations. Plus, the tone is biased, which is also not good; an objective tone is optimal.